All fields start blank. Enter the right-hand (pre-ductal) and foot (post-ductal) SpO₂ from the first screen.
Model, equations and sources
Algorithm
Screen 1 (age ≥24 h, room air; right hand = pre-ductal, foot = post-ductal)
Any SpO2 <90% (hand or foot) -> FAIL
Hand ≥95% AND foot ≥95% AND |hand - foot| ≤3% -> PASS
Otherwise (90-94% in hand or foot, OR difference >3%) -> REPEAT once in 1 hour
Screen 2
Any SpO2 <90% -> FAIL
Hand ≥95% AND foot ≥95% AND |hand - foot| ≤3% -> PASS
Otherwise -> FAIL (no third screen)
Martin 2020 (expert panel) recommended two changes to the 2011 AAP algorithm: “requiring an oxygen saturation of at least 95% in both (formerly either) the upper and lower extremities to pass” and “requiring only 1 repeat screen instead of 2 for cases that neither pass nor fail initially” (abstract). The 2025 AAP clinical report (Oster 2025) endorsed this as the new AAP algorithm.
The branch wording above follows the CDC summary of the AAP algorithm (fail: any measure <90% in either the right hand or foot on the initial or repeat screen; <95% in either on 2 measures; >3% difference on 2 measures, each separated by 1 hour; pass: ≥95% in both and ≤3% absolute difference) and the Tennessee Department of Health protocol that cites Martin 2020. The AAP figure itself was not retrieved for this prototype.
The difference is absolute: a foot reading higher than the hand counts the same as a lower one (as in the CDC wording, “≤3% absolute difference”).
Published example (Tennessee protocol): “a 96% in the foot and 100% in the hand after one repeat would fail”. This page gives the same answer.
One edge case: a first screen that is borderline only because of a >3% difference, followed by a repeat with both values 90–94% and no difference, meets neither CDC “2 measures” rule literally. Because the updated algorithm allows only one repeat, this page calls any repeat that does not pass a fail, as the Tennessee flowchart does.
After the screen (Tennessee protocol, citing Martin 2020)
Fail: notify the medical practitioner; evaluate for other causes of low saturation (for example persistent pulmonary hypertension, pneumonia, infection); in the absence of a clear cause, obtain a diagnostic echocardiogram interpreted by an expert in infant echocardiography, reviewed before discharge. SpO2 <90% at any time needs immediate clinical assessment and no rescreen.
Pass: does not exclude a cardiac disorder. If cardiac evaluation is otherwise indicated (clinical signs, prenatal diagnosis, dysmorphic features), proceed even after a pass.
State programs differ in details (for example, the Tennessee protocol adds a foot-first step and rules for screens before 24 hours). Follow your state's protocol.
Input checks
SpO2 must be a whole number from 50 to 100%. Age 0–720 hours; under 24 hours gives a caution, not a block.
Verification
Checked against the official 2025 AAP screening algorithm (Figure 1, as published by the CDC): this page gives the same pass, repeat or fail result for every combination of hand and foot SpO2 tested (2,601 first screens and 18,207 two-screen sequences), October 2026.
References
Martin GR, Ewer AK, Gaviglio A, et al. Updated strategies for pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 2020;146(1):e20191650. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1650 (abstract read via PubMed; full text not retrieved).
Oster ME, Pinto NM, Pramanik AK, et al. Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: a new algorithm and other updated recommendations: clinical report. Pediatrics 2025;155(1):e2024069667. doi:10.1542/peds.2024-069667 (abstract).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical screening and diagnosis for critical congenital heart defects: cdc.gov/heart-defects/hcp/screening (read October 2026).
Tennessee Department of Health. Protocol for Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) Screening, revised 9/21/2021: tn.gov (PDF).
Computed in this browser; nothing you enter in the calculator is stored or sent.
A pass can falsely reassure: pulse-oximetry screening does not detect every critical heart defect. Clinical examination still matters.